Persistent somatic symptoms are key to individual illness perception at one year after COVID-19 (preprint)

Background: Sequelae of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were investigated by both patient-initiated and academic initiatives. Patient's subjective illness perceptions might differ from physician's clinical assessment results. Herein, we explored factors influencing patient's perception during COVID-19 recovery. Methods: Participants of the prospective observation CovILD study with persistent somatic symptoms or cardiopulmonary findings at the clinical follow-up one year after COVID-19 were analyzed (n = 74). Explanatory variables included baseline demographic and comorbidity data, COVID-19 course and one-year follow-up data of persistent somatic symptoms, physical performance, lung function testing (LFT), chest computed tomography (CT) and trans-thoracic echocardiography (TTE). Factors affecting illness perception (Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, BIPQ) were identified by penalized multi-parameter regression and unsupervised clustering. Results: In modeling, 47% of overall illness perception variance at one year after COVID-19 was attributed to fatigue intensity, reduced physical performance, hair loss and baseline respiratory comorbidity. Overall illness perception was independent of LFT results, pulmonary lesions in CT or heart abnormality in TTE. As identified by clustering, persistent somatic symptom count, fatigue, diminished physical performance, dyspnea, hair loss and sleep problems at the one-year follow-up and severe acute COVID-19 were associated with the BIPQ domains of concern, emotional representation, complaints, disease timeline and consequences. Conclusion: Persistent somatic symptoms rather than clinical assessment results, revealing lung and heart abnormalities, impact on severity and quality of illness perception at one year after COVID-19 and may foster unhelpful coping mechanisms. Besides COVID-19 severity, individual illness perception should be taken into account when allocating rehabilitation and psychological therapy resources. Study registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04416100.

Distinct smell and taste disorder phenotype of post-acute COVID-19 sequelae (preprint)

Background Olfactory dysfunction (OD) often accompanies acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and its sequelae. Herein, we investigated OD during COVID-19 recovery in the context of other symptoms, quality of life, physical and mental health. Methods Symptom recovery patterns were analyzed in a bi-national, ambulatory COVID-19 survey (n = 906, ≥ 90 days follow-up) and a multi-center observational cross-sectional cohort of ambulatory and hospitalized individuals (n = 108, 360 days follow-up) with multi-dimensional scaling, association rule mining and partitioning around medoids clustering. Results Both in the ambulatory collective (72%, n = 655/906) and the cross-sectional ambulatory and hospitalized cohort (41%, n = 44/108) self-reported OD was frequent during acute COVID-19, displayed a slow recovery pace (ambulatory: 28 days, cross-sectional: 90 days median recovery time) and commonly co-occurred with taste disorders. In the ambulatory collective, a predominantly young, female, comorbidity-free group of convalescents with persistent OD and taste disorder (>90 days) was identified. This post-acute smell and taste disorder phenotype was characterized by a low frequency of other leading post-acute symptoms including fatigue, respiratory and neurocognitive complaints. Despite a protracted smell and taste dysfunction, this subset had high ratings of physical performance, mental health, and quality of life. Conclusion Our results underline the clinical heterogeneity of post-acute COVID-19 sequelae calling for tailored management strategies. The persistent smell and taste disorder phenotype may represent a distinct COVID-19 recovery pathway characterized by a good recovery of other COVID-19 related symptoms. Study registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04661462 (ambulatory collective), NCT04416100 (cross-sectional cohort).

SARS-CoV-2 Beta variant infection elicits potent lineage-specific and cross-reactive antibodies (preprint)

SARS-CoV-2 Beta variant of concern (VOC) resists neutralization by major classes of antibodies from non-VOC COVID-19 patients and vaccinated individuals. Here, serum of Beta variant infected patients revealed reduced cross-neutralization of non-VOC virus. From these patients, we isolated Beta-specific and cross-reactive receptor-binding domain (RBD) antibodies. The Beta-specificity results from recruitment of novel VOC-specific clonotypes and accommodation of VOC-defining amino acids into a major non-VOC antibody class that is normally sensitive to these mutations. The Beta-elicited cross-reactive antibodies share genetic and structural features with non-VOC-elicited antibodies, including a public VH1-58 clonotype targeting the RBD ridge independent of VOC mutations. These findings advance our understanding of the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 shaped by antigenic drift with implications for design of next-generation vaccines and therapeutics. One sentence summarySARS-CoV-2 Beta variant elicits lineage-specific antibodies and antibodies with neutralizing breadth against wild-type virus and VOCs.

Who is at risk of poor mental health following COVID-19 outpatient management? (preprint)

BackgroundCOVID-19 convalescents are at risk of developing a de novo mental health disorder or of worsening of a pre-existing one. The objectives of our study was to phenotype individuals at highest risk of mental health disorders among COVID-19 outpatients. MethodsWe conducted a binational online survey study with adult non-hospitalized COVID-19 convalescents (Austria/AT: n=1157, Italy/IT: n= 893). Primary endpoints were positive screening for depression and anxiety (PHQ-4, Patient Health Questionnaire) and self-perceived overall mental health and quality of life rated with 4 point Likert scales. Psychosocial stress was surveyed with a modified PHQ stress module. Associations of the mental health with socio-demographic variables, COVID-19 course and recovery data were assessed by multi-parameter random forest and serial univariable modeling. Mental disorder risk subsets were defined by self-organizing map and hierarchical clustering algorithms. The survey analyses are publicly available (https://im2-ibk.shinyapps.io/mental_health_dashboard/). ResultsIn the study cohorts, 4.6 (IT)/6% (AT) of participants reported depression and/or anxiety before to infection. At a median of 79 days (AT)/96 days (IT) post COVID-19 onset, 12.4 (AT)/19.3% (IT) of subjects were screened positive for anxiety and 17.3 (AT)/23.2% (IT) for depression. Over one-fifth of the respondents rated their overall mental health (AT: 21.8%, IT: 24.1%) or quality of life (AT: 20.3%, IT: 25.9%) as fair or poor. In both study collectives, psychosocial stress, high numbers of acute and persistent COVID-19 complaints and the presence of acute neurocognitive symptoms (impaired concentration, confusion, forgetfulness) were the strongest correlates of deteriorating mental health and poor quality of life. In clustering analysis, these variables defined a high risk subset with particularly high propensity of post-COVID-19 mental health impairment and decreased quality of life. Pre-existing depression or anxiety was associated with an increased symptom burden during acute COVID-19 and recovery. ConclusionOur study revealed a bidirectional relationship between COVID-19 symptoms and mental health. We put forward specific acute symptoms of the disease as red flags of mental health deterioration which should prompt general practitioners to identify COVID-19 patients who may benefit from early psychological and psychiatric intervention. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04661462.

Investigating phenotypes of pulmonary COVID-19 recovery – a longitudinal observational prospective multicenter trial (preprint)

Background COVID-19 is associated with long-term pulmonary symptoms and may result in chronic pulmonary impairment. The optimal procedures to prevent, identify, monitor, and treat these pulmonary sequelae are elusive. Research question To characterize the kinetics of pulmonary recovery, risk factors and constellations of clinical features linked to persisting radiological lung findings after COVID-19. Study design and methods A longitudinal, prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study including COVID-19 patients (n = 108). Longitudinal pulmonary imaging and functional readouts, symptom prevalence, clinical and laboratory parameters were collected during acute COVID-19 and at 60-, 100- and 180-days follow-up visits. Recovery kinetics and risk factors were investigated by logistic regression. Classification of clinical features and study participants was accomplished by k-means clustering, the k-nearest neighbors (kNN), and naive Bayes algorithms. Results At the six-month follow-up, 51.9% of participants reported persistent symptoms with physical performance impairment (27.8%) and dyspnea (24.1%) being the most frequent. Structural lung abnormalities were still present in 45.4% of the collective, ranging from 12% in the outpatients to 78% in the subjects treated at the ICU during acute infection. The strongest risk factors of persisting lung findings were elevated interleukin-6 (IL6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) during recovery and hospitalization during acute COVID-19. Clustering analysis revealed association of the lung lesions with increased anti-S1/S2 antibody, IL6, CRP, and D-dimer levels at the early follow-up suggesting non-resolving inflammation as a mechanism of the perturbed recovery. Finally, we demonstrate the robustness of risk class assignment and prediction of individual risk of delayed lung recovery employing clustering and machine learning algorithms. Interpretation Severity of acute infection, and systemic inflammation is strongly linked to persistent post-COVID-19 lung abnormality. Automated screening of multi-parameter health record data may assist the identification of patients at risk of delayed pulmonary recovery and optimize COVID-19 follow-up management. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04416100

Neurological Outcome and Quality of Life Three Months after COVID-19: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study (preprint)

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence suggests the involvement of the central and peripheral nervous system in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Little is known about neurological outcomes and quality of life (QoL) after recovery from acute infection.METHODS: In this prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study we systematically evaluated neurological signs and diseases by detailed neurological examination and a predefined test battery assessing smelling disorders (16-item Sniffin-Sticks-test), cognitive deficits (Montreal Cognitive Assessment), QoL (36-item Short Form), and mental health (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-5) three months after disease onset.FINDINGS: Of 135 COVID-19 patients included, 31 (23%) required ICU-care (severe), 72 (53%) were admitted to the regular ward (moderate), and 32 (24%) underwent outpatient-care (mild) during acute disease. At three-month follow-up, 20 patients (15%) presented with one or more neurological syndromes that were not evident before COVID-19. These included poly-neuro/myopathy (n=16, 12%), mild encephalopathy (n=2, 2%), parkinsonism (n=1, 1%), orthostatic hypotension (n=1, 1%), Guillain-Barré-Syndrome (n=1, 1%) and ischemic stroke (n=1, 1%). Self-reported hyposmia/anosmia was noted in 23/135 patients (17%), which was significantly lower compared to those documented during acute COVID-19 (44%; p<0·001). Interestingly, objective testing revealed hyposmia/anosmia in 57/127 (45%) patients at three-month follow-up. In ICU patients, encephalopathy significantly improved over time (from 29% (9/31) during acute disease to 3% (1/31) at follow-up, p=0·008). At follow-up, cognitive deficits were apparent in 23% (29/124), and QoL was impaired in 31% (28/90). Assessment of mental health revealed symptoms of depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorders in 11%, 25%, and 11%, respectively.INTERPRETATION: Despite recovery from acute infection, neurological symptoms were prevalent at three-months follow-up. Above all, smelling disorders were persistent in a large proportion of patients. Our results urge for further studies investigating the onset and evolution of neurological diseases following COVID-19 infection to develop strategies for secondary prevention.TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04416100)FUNDING: Not applicable.DECLARATION OF INTERESTS: KS reports grants from FWF Austrian Science Fund, grants from Michael J. Fox Foundation, grants from International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society, personal fees from Teva, personal fees from UCB, personal fees from Lundbeck, personal fees from AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG, personal fees from Abbvie, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Grünenthal; all outside the submitted work. PM reports grants from TWF (Tyrolean Science Fund), grants from Medtronic, personal fees from Boston Scientific, all outside the submitted work. The other authors have nothing to disclose. All other authors declare no competing interests.ETHICS APPROVAL STATEMENT: The conduct of the study was approved by the local ethics committee (Medical University of Innsbruck, EK Nr: 1103/2020). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients according to local regulations.

Overcoming Limitations in the Availability of Swabs Systems Used for SARS-CoV-2 Laboratory Diagnostics (preprint)

The diagnosis of COVID-19 relies on the direct detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in respiratory specimens by RT-PCR. The pandemic spread of the disease caused an imbalance between demand and supply of materials and reagents needed for diagnostic purposes including swab sets. In a comparative effectiveness study, we conducted serial follow-up swabs in hospitalized laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients. We assessed the diagnostic performance of an in-house system developed according to recommendations by the US CDC. In a total of 96 swabs, we found significant differences in the accuracy of the different swab systems to generate a positive result in SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR, ranging from around 50 to 80%. Of note, an in-house swab system was superior to most commercially available sets as reflected by significantly lower Ct values of viral genes. Thus, a simple combination of broadly available materials may enable diagnostic laboratories to bypass global limitations in the supply of swab sets.